PIPages
Labs

Diana Foster

University of California-San Francisco, CA·Public Health & Epidemiology

In June 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v.

Fields

Public Health & Epidemiology

Social Science

Medicine & Clinical Research

Topics

abortion

Roe v. Wade

Dobbs

Grants
1 known grant, through May 2029

What they work on

  1. Compare long-term health and economic outcomes among people who had an abortion before a state ban, traveled to an out-of-state clinic, sought abortion outside the legal medical system, or carried to term, using multilevel regression on longitudinal surveys.
  2. Assess whether abortion-access helplines reduce harm by linking participants' helpline experiences to their decisions to keep seeking abortion, their success in obtaining one, and its timing.
  3. Conduct in-depth qualitative interviews with people affected by abortion bans, focusing on especially vulnerable groups, and integrate findings with survey data to understand their decisions and experiences.

More about the research

Wade, ending the federal right to abortion. Many states have since banned or limited abortion. These bans affect tens of millions of women of reproductive age, plus trans men and nonbinary people who can become pregnant. People in states with bans must now travel out of state, order abortion pills online to manage their own abortion, try less safe methods, or carry the pregnancy to term. The health and economic effects of this shift are unknown, and the years before Roe are a poor guide.

Why it matters

Policymakers currently have little direct evidence on what state abortion bans do to people's health and finances. By tracking outcomes among people who obtained abortions before or despite bans and those who could not, this work could inform state abortion policy. It could also guide harm-reduction strategies, such as helpline services, for pregnant people living in states without legal abortion.

Known grants

From NIH and NSF research grants. Labs often have other funding we can't see.

Health and economic consequences of changing federal and state policies on reproductive health.

NIH · Sep 2024 – May 2029

Closest labs

Maria Steenland

University of Maryland, MD·Public Health & Epidemiology

Compare rates of severe maternal morbidity and potentially avoidable delivery complications between pregnant people on Emergency Medicaid and those on full-scope Medicaid, using national Medicaid claims data from 2019–2022.

Sabrina Boyce

University of California-Berkeley, CA·Public Health & Epidemiology

Estimate the causal effect of state anti-SGM and SGM-affirming laws adopted from 2021 to 2025 on sexual and intimate partner violence among SGM youth, using difference-in-differences analysis of Youth Risk Behavior Survey data.

Nicole Kelly

University of California-San Diego, CA·Public Health & Epidemiology·Early-career

Evaluate how North Carolina's Medicaid expansion affected use of long-acting injectable HIV therapy (LAI-ART) and opioid use disorder medication (LAI-MOUD) among people with both conditions, using quasi-experimental policy evaluation methods.

The school

University of California-San Francisco: 89 labs on PI Pages, $2.1B a year on research, 164 research doctorates a year.

More about University of California-San Francisco

Reach out

A start for your email. Fill in the brackets.